Home › Politics › What Taylor's testimony meant for Kyiv
What Taylor's testimony meant for Kyiv
Summary
A look back at the congressional testimony of the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine on 22 October 2019, and what it said about military aid.
What did the acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine tell Congress, and why did it matter in Kyiv? On 22 October 2019, William B. Taylor Jr. testified in the impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump. He said he had been told that President Trump would withhold military aid to Ukraine until the country publicly declared that investigations would be launched.
According to the testimony, the investigations concerned two subjects: Burisma Holdings, a company that had hired Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President Joe Biden, and Ukraine's alleged involvement in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Taylor said he understood the aid would be held back to help Trump's reelection chances.
The wider context
The testimony sat within a larger scandal. Later accounts described it as arising from efforts to press Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, a rival for the 2020 Democratic nomination. Those accounts said Trump enlisted surrogates, including his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and Attorney General William Barr, and blocked a congressionally mandated $400 million military aid package. Contacts between the White House and Ukraine's government culminated in a phone call between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy on 25 July 2019.
Why it mattered for Ukraine
For Ukraine, the central point was that military assistance was described as being tied to public declarations about investigations. Taylor's account, given as a serving diplomat in Kyiv, linked the aid directly to the president's domestic political interests in Washington.
