Home › Security › Who is a target once weapons cross the border?
Who is a target once weapons cross the border?
Summary
On 26 April 2022, statements from London, Moscow and Berlin turned the question of Western arms into a dispute over legitimate targets.
What happens when the weapons sent to Ukraine become the argument for striking back? On 26 April 2022, that question moved from the background to the centre of the war's diplomacy, as Russian and British officials traded warnings and Germany announced its first heavy weapons delivery.
London and Moscow trade warnings
The United Kingdom's Armed Forces Secretary, James Heappey, said that Ukraine could use British weapons to strike targets inside Russia. He called this completely legitimate as a means of disrupting attacks on Ukraine. The Russian Defence Ministry responded by accusing the UK of provoking Ukraine into attacking Russian territory, and warned of a proportional response should any such attacks occur.
The exchange came a day after two large fires broke out at an oil refinery and a military depot in Bryansk, Russia, on 25 April. Both reports were part of the same picture: a war in which the fighting was touching Russian soil as well as Ukrainian.
Lavrov frames the supply of arms
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov went further. He said weapons supplied to Ukraine would be a legitimate target for Russia's military, and that storage facilities in western Ukraine had been targeted. He also said NATO was, in essence, engaged in a war with Russia through a proxy and was arming that proxy, adding that war means war.
The statement tied together two things: the flow of Western equipment and the geography of Russian strikes. On the same day, Ukrainian authorities said a Russian missile strike had destroyed a strategic bridge across the Dniester Estuary in Odesa Oblast. A day earlier, regional authorities said five people had been killed by airstrikes on Zhmerynka and Koziatyn in Vinnytsia Oblast, and a person was killed when Russia bombed the Kremenchuk Oil Refinery in Poltava Oblast. These were places well away from the front lines in the east and south.
Berlin changes course
Germany announced the delivery of 50 ex-Bundeswehr Gepard anti-air tanks to Ukraine. It was the first heavy weaponry Germany had supplied since the start of the invasion. The announcement arrived as the diplomatic temperature between the two countries was already low: on 25 April Russia's foreign ministry expelled 40 German diplomatic staff, in retaliation for Germany expelling the same number of Russian diplomats.
The Gepard decision also followed the visit to Kyiv on 24 April by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. They met President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was informed of newly approved military assistance. It was the highest-level American visit in Kyiv since the invasion began.
A ceasefire appeal in Moscow
Against this backdrop, UN Secretary-General António Guterres travelled to Moscow to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin. Before the meeting he called for a ceasefire to end the war. The contrast was stark: while the UN chief urged a halt to fighting, the same day's statements from Russian and British officials concerned where force could legitimately be used and against what.
What the day showed
The sequence of 24 to 26 April 2022 shows how closely aid and escalation rhetoric were linked. American approval of new assistance, a German shift to heavy weapons and a British minister's comments on striking inside Russia were each answered, in word at least, by Moscow. Russia described the arms pipeline as a target, and described the supplying states as parties to the war.
For Ukraine's partners, the day set out the terms of the debate: how far to go in supplying weapons and how to talk about their use. For Moscow, it offered a public justification for strikes on storage sites and on infrastructure far from the front. Guterres's ceasefire call, made in Moscow itself, sat alongside those positions rather than resolving them.
