Home › Opinion › What 5 August 2022 showed about the war's wider fronts
What 5 August 2022 showed about the war's wider fronts
Summary
A look back at a day when the war touched a nuclear plant, foreign-owned assets and the occupation administration in Kherson Oblast.
What did the war look like on 5 August 2022, away from the main battle lines? The reports from that day and the one before it point to pressure on several fronts at once: nuclear safety, economic retaliation and the running of occupied territory.
A damaged nuclear plant
Ukraine's nuclear agency, Energoatom, said Russian rockets had damaged the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. It listed a nitrogen-oxygen unit and a high-voltage power line among the damage. The claim was part of the Southern Ukraine campaign, and it placed a nuclear facility directly among the sites affected by the fighting.
Moscow tightens its grip on assets
On the same day, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree banning investors from "unfriendly countries" from selling their assets in Russian banks, strategic entities, and energy and commodity projects until 31 December. The decree shows the economic dimension of the conflict: restrictions on who could exit Russian holdings were added to the measures taken since the invasion.
Instability in occupied Kherson
Volodymyr Saldo, head of the Russian occupation administration in Kherson Oblast, was hospitalised on 5 August 2022. Sergei Eliseev, a former FSB officer, took over his post temporarily. The reports gave no further detail, but the change put a former security officer in charge of the occupation administration.
Civilian risk, argued from two directions
The preceding day, 4 August, brought two reports that bear on how civilians were being affected. Regional governor Pavlo Kyrylenko said a Russian strike on a bus stop in Toretsk killed eight civilians and injured four. Separately, Amnesty International published a report alleging that Ukrainian forces had endangered civilians by setting up bases and operating weapons systems in residential areas, schools and hospitals, which it said violated international humanitarian law by turning civilian objects into military targets.
Taken together, these items show a war in which civilian harm, the safety of critical infrastructure and economic controls were all in play on the same two days. Each was reported separately, and the sources, from a state nuclear agency to a regional governor and an international rights group, made different claims about different events.
