Ukraine and its neighbours, explained

Advertisement

Home › Politics › Why Kyiv rejected Russia's Christmas ceasefire offer

Politics

Why Kyiv rejected Russia's Christmas ceasefire offer

Summary

A look back at the unilateral truce announced for Orthodox Christmas and the reason Ukraine gave for declining a mutual one.

What did a unilateral ceasefire mean when the side announcing it was the invader? That was the question around 6 January 2023, the first day of a pause Russian President Vladimir Putin had announced the previous evening.

How the truce came about

On 5 January 2023, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, head of the Russian Orthodox Church, called on both sides in the war for an Orthodox Christmas truce. The same evening, Putin announced a unilateral ceasefire for 6–7 January, tied to Christmas on the Julian calendar. As reported at the time, he instructed Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu to declare a 36-hour pause along the entire line of contact. It was to run from midday on 6 January until midnight between 7 and 8 January.

Kyiv's answer

Ukraine rejected an offer to respond with a mutual ceasefire, citing a lack of trust. The refusal meant the pause remained a one-sided declaration rather than an agreed arrangement between the two armies.

What the episode showed

The sequence was short and clear. A religious leader made the appeal, the Russian president turned it into a declared pause within hours, and Kyiv declined to reciprocate. The stated reason was trust, not the calendar or the holiday itself.

The proposal also showed how the truce was framed. It was linked to the Orthodox Christmas observance, and its duration was limited to a day and a half. Ukraine's response meant there was no bilateral commitment behind it.

Related analysis