Home › Opinion › Why did English law matter on 27 June 2024?
Why did English law matter on 27 June 2024?
Summary
A language law signed in Kyiv sat among court rulings, a prisoner swap and a Baltic-Polish defence proposal in the same week.
What did Ukraine signal when its president signed a law on English? On 27 June 2024, Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed legislation establishing English as an official language of international communication in Ukraine.
The measure arrived in a week crowded with external events involving Russia and its neighbours, and the surrounding days give it a context.
Courts and warrants
On 25 June 2024, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Valery Gerasimov, Russia's Chief of the General Staff, and Sergei Shoigu, the former defence minister. The same day, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously found Russia guilty of systematic human rights violations in the Crimean peninsula. Both rulings came from international institutions, and both concerned Russia's conduct in the war with Ukraine.
Exchange and fortification
Also on 25 June 2024, Russia and Ukraine each returned 90 prisoners of war in an exchange mediated by the United Arab Emirates. A third party brokered the swap, which shows how Ukraine's dealings with Russia ran through outside intermediaries.
On 26 June 2024, the leaders of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia called on the European Union to build a €2.5 billion (US$2.67 billion) defence line between them and Russia and Belarus. Their stated aim was to secure the EU from military, economic and migrant-related threats.
Reading the language law
Set beside these events, the English-language law fits a pattern of Ukraine engaging with international bodies and partners. Courts in The Hague and Strasbourg were acting on Russian conduct, a Gulf state was mediating exchanges, and EU frontline states were pressing for a shared defence project. A law naming English as a language of international communication points in the same outward direction.
The law's practical effects, though, are not something the events of that week settle. The measure was a legal step on a single day, and its weight lay in its place within a wider international picture rather than in any immediate result.
