Ukraine and its neighbours, explained

Advertisement

Home › Security › Istanbul talks: who blinked on the ceasefire?

Security

Istanbul talks: who blinked on the ceasefire?

Summary

A retrospective on the diplomatic positions taken ahead of the proposed Istanbul talks, as they stood on 16 May 2025.

What was actually on the table on 16 May 2025, the day after the date Russia had proposed for direct talks in Istanbul? The answer lay in a dispute over sequence: ceasefire first, or negotiations first.

How the Istanbul idea arose

On 11 May 2025, Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed direct negotiations in Istanbul, Turkey, on 15 May. The proposal came after the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Poland threatened further sanctions if Russia did not agree to an unconditional 30-day ceasefire beginning on 12 May. Moscow's offer therefore answered a call for a truce with an offer of talks.

Kyiv's condition

On the same day, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called on Russia to confirm an unconditional ceasefire before any direct negotiations between the two countries. The positions were thus not mirror images. The European demand and Kyiv's response placed a halt to fighting first; Putin's proposal placed the meeting first.

The wider gap

As later described, the two leaders' broader aims were far apart. Putin sought recognition of all occupied land as Russian, guarantees that Ukraine would never join NATO, a curtailment of Ukraine's military and the lifting of sanctions. Zelenskyy sought a ceasefire, full withdrawal of Russian troops, the return of prisoners and kidnapped Ukrainian children, prosecution of Russian leaders for war crimes, and security guarantees. Against that backdrop, a dispute over the order of steps was a visible sign of a much deeper divide.

A humanitarian strand

The humanitarian dimension was also in view. In his first Sunday address on 11 May, Pope Leo XIV called for peace in Ukraine, the release of all war prisoners and the return of abducted Ukrainian children to their families, alongside appeals on Gaza and the India–Pakistan conflict. Children were an issue Kyiv itself placed among its aims. According to later accounts, Russia has forcibly transferred almost 20,000 Ukrainian children to areas under its control, and the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Putin and Russia's Children's Rights Commissioner Maria Lvova-Belova.

What to take from it

By 16 May 2025 the diplomatic contest was about terms of engagement as much as substance. European governments tied sanctions pressure to an unconditional 30-day ceasefire, Kyiv wanted that ceasefire confirmed before talks, and Moscow offered a venue and a date. Whether the Istanbul format could bridge that gap was the open question of the moment.

Related analysis