Home › Opinion › What the Parnas and Fruman pleas meant for Kyiv
What the Parnas and Fruman pleas meant for Kyiv
Summary
A retrospective on the not-guilty pleas entered in New York two days before 25 October 2019, and on how a US campaign-finance case touched Ukraine.
What did a New York courtroom have to do with Kyiv? On 25 October 2019, the question was still open after a hearing two days earlier, on 23 October, in which Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman pleaded not guilty to campaign-finance charges.
The two men were associates of Rudy Giuliani, personal lawyer to U.S. President Donald Trump. As reported at the time, they had aided Giuliani in a search in Ukraine for damaging information on the president's political opponents. Prosecutors charged that they funneled $350,000 in illegal donations to a pro-Trump political committee and another $20,000 to former Republican Congressman Pete Sessions, while acting on behalf of at least one Ukrainian government official.
The wider scandal
The case sat inside what became known as the 2019 Trump–Ukraine scandal. Later accounts describe it as arising from Trump's attempts to press Ukraine to investigate his rival Joe Biden, with surrogates including Giuliani enlisted to apply that pressure. Those accounts also say a $400 million military aid package was blocked, and that contacts between the White House and the Ukrainian government led to a phone call between Trump and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on 25 July 2019.
The not-guilty pleas settled nothing about guilt. They did place Giuliani's Ukraine-related activity before a court, through the charge that the money was given on behalf of a Ukrainian government official.
A separate Ukrainian story
The same week brought unrelated news. On 23 October 2019, Ukraine released the final report into the Yirol crash of a Let L-410 Turbolet, prepared by South Sudan. It concluded that mistakes by both crew and maintenance, combined with poor weather, caused the crash.
Together, the two items showed Ukraine in the headlines for very different reasons: one a matter of foreign political controversy, the other an aviation investigation with a clear technical finding.
