Home › World › Why the UN rejected extending Iran's arms embargo
Why the UN rejected extending Iran's arms embargo
Summary
A look back at the Security Council vote of 14 August 2020, in which a US bid to extend the embargo indefinitely won the support of only one other member.
What did it mean when the United States could muster just one ally on the UN Security Council? On 14 August 2020, the council voted on a US resolution to extend indefinitely the global arms embargo on Iran, and the result was a clear defeat for Washington.
The resolution received support only from the Dominican Republic. Adoption required at least nine "yes" votes on the 15-member body, so the measure fell far short. Eleven members abstained, among them France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Russia and China opposed extending the ban, though they did not need to use their vetoes, because the text had already failed to reach the threshold.
Reading the numbers
The breakdown matters as much as the outcome. Three of the abstainers were close US partners, which showed that the proposal lacked backing even among states that had not joined Russia and China in opposing it. The vote did not hinge on the veto power of permanent members; it failed on arithmetic alone.
The wider setting
The vote came within a long record of international pressure on Iran. Sanctions have been imposed by the United Nations and, separately, by the United States, the European Union and other countries, in response to Iran's nuclear programme, alleged support for terrorism, human rights violations and military conduct in the Persian Gulf. The 14 August vote concerned one specific instrument within that framework: the arms embargo, and whether it should be extended without a time limit.
The council's answer on that day was that it should not.
