Ukraine and its neighbours, explained

Advertisement

Home › Politics › Iran's reversal over the downed Ukrainian airliner

Politics

Iran's reversal over the downed Ukrainian airliner

Summary

A look back at the 12 January 2020 aftermath of the Flight 752 shoot-down, after Tehran dropped its claim of mechanical failure.

What did Iran admit, and how quickly did its account change? By 12 January 2020, the question had a clear answer: Iran's armed forces had shot down a Ukrainian passenger jet, and the president of Iran had said so officially.

The aircraft was Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752, a Boeing 737-800 on a scheduled service from Tehran to Kyiv. It was shot down on 8 January 2020 shortly after takeoff, and all 176 people on board were killed. The background to the incident later made clear that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps was responsible.

From denial to admission

The shift came within days. On 10 January 2020, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau suggested that an Iranian missile had brought the plane down. Iranian authorities rejected the idea at once. The head of Iran's civil aviation authority said he was certain that no missile had hit the aircraft, and he continued to put the crash down to mechanical failure.

That position did not last. On 11 January 2020, the Iranian president officially acknowledged that the country's armed forces had mistakenly shot down the Ukrainian airliner with a missile near Tehran. The admission replaced the earlier explanation of a technical fault with a statement that the aircraft had been hit in error.

The state of play on 12 January 2020

By 12 January 2020, then, the public record had moved from an unexplained crash and a denial to an official Iranian acknowledgement. The sequence ran from the downing on 8 January, through the rejection of the missile theory on 10 January, to the admission on 11 January.

For Ukraine, whose national carrier had lost its aircraft on a route to Kyiv, the admission settled the question of cause. It left open the matters that would come after it, which this account does not try to anticipate.

Related analysis